-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
fix boto3_route53 module for Python3 #60951
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix boto3_route53 module for Python3 #60951
Conversation
Hi there! Welcome to the Salt Community! Thank you for making your first contribution. We have a lengthy process for issues and PRs. Someone from the Core Team will follow up as soon as possible. In the meantime, here’s some information that may help as you continue your Salt journey.
There are lots of ways to get involved in our community. Every month, there are around a dozen opportunities to meet with other contributors and the Salt Core team and collaborate in real time. The best way to keep track is by subscribing to the Salt Community Events Calendar. |
any chances that @krionbsd or @saltstack/team-boto review this PR? |
Any chance to add a test case for these changes in |
d259b23
to
c9b1de4
Compare
test added |
Looks like this fixes #59755. |
56e3928
to
a6d2d69
Compare
@krionbsd any chance to review this PR? |
@krionbsd failed test is not related to this PR |
Hi! I'm your friendly PR bot!You might be wondering what I'm doing commenting here on your PR. Yes, as a matter of fact, I am... I'm just here to help us improve the documentation. I can't respond to Okay... so what do you do? I detect modules that are missing docstrings or "CLI Example" on existing docstrings! So what does that have to do with my PR? I noticed that in this PR there are some files changed that have some of these Okay, what are they? Well, my favorite, is that since you were making changes here I'm hoping that If I can, then what? Well, you can either add them to this PR or add them to another PR. Either way is fine! Well... what if I can't, or don't want to? That's also fine! We appreciate all contributions to the Salt Project. If you Whatever approach you decide to take, just drop a comment here letting us know! Detected Issues (click me)Check Known Missing Docstrings...........................................Failed - hook id: invoke - duration: 1.55s - exit code: 1 Thanks again! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know if it's worth blocking this PR on any of my comments. If you want to make those changes, then awesome! Otherwise I think just having the record of desired changes is good enough 👍
def __virtual__(): | ||
""" | ||
Returns True/False boolean depending on if Boto3 is installed and correct | ||
version. | ||
""" | ||
if not HAS_BOTO3: | ||
return False | ||
if LooseVersion(boto3.__version__) < LooseVersion(REQUIRED_BOTO3_VERSION): | ||
return ( | ||
False, | ||
"The boto3 module must be greater or equal to version {}".format( | ||
REQUIRED_BOTO3_VERSION | ||
), | ||
) | ||
return True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion __virtual__
only applies to Salt modules/states, not tests.
} | ||
|
||
|
||
@skipIf(HAS_BOTO3 is False, "The boto module must be installed.") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion can just use the module's HAS_BOTO3 - either skipIf(boto3_route53.HAS_BOTO3...
or import HAS_BOTO3 from the module
random.choice(string.ascii_lowercase + string.digits) for _ in range(50) | ||
) | ||
|
||
self.conn = MagicMock() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion(non-blocking) create_autospec
is preferred (or patch(..., autospec=True)
) to a bare MagicMock, since it will get you the correct signature. Sometimes it's not appropriate, though.
[ | ||
{ | ||
"Name": "blog.saltstack.furniture.", | ||
"ResourceRecords": [{"Value": "127.0.0.1"}], | ||
"TTL": 60, | ||
"Type": "A", | ||
} | ||
], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
praise for tests we love to see hard coded expected values.
Congratulations on your first PR being merged! 🎉 |
What does this PR do?
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
Fixes: this PR fixed
re.sub
behaviour for Python 3Previous Behavior
New Behavior
Remove this section if not relevant
Merge requirements satisfied?
[NOTICE] Bug fixes or features added to Salt require tests.
Commits signed with GPG?
Yes