Fix presence events on TCP transport - #62827
Conversation
|
This patch does even more, it fixes a memory leak. Leaking objects: The leak was discovered immediately after the update to 3005. Thank you @recmanj |
|
@dwoz PTAL |
dwoz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm good with this change but it would be nice to have a test which verifies the presence callbacks are getting called.
|
@sakateka Just a heads up about the request to add an additional test for this change. |
|
bump @recmanj are you willing to add test coverage here? |
|
@Ch3LL on its way |
|
We're wanting to tag for 3006 this friday. I would really love to try to get this in. Any luck on adding test coverage? |
|
Will push them tomorrow afternoon, sorry |
…o fix-tcp-presence-events

What does this PR do?
Fixes presence events by removing a client's presence correctly.
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
Fixes: #62826
Previous Behavior
Presence events not fired when salt-minion status changes.
New Behavior
Presence events fired correctly when salt-minion status changes.
Merge requirements satisfied?
Commits signed with GPG?
No