Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

conbytes #315

Closed
samuelcolvin opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

conbytes #315

samuelcolvin opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@samuelcolvin
Copy link
Owner

@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin commented Nov 30, 2018

As per #311 (comment) we should implement conbytes and suport it in Schema.

Exactly the same as constr but for bytes.

cc @tiangolo

@tiangolo
Copy link
Collaborator

@tiangolo tiangolo commented Nov 30, 2018

@samuelcolvin Do you want me to implement it as part of #311 ? Or should it be a posterior PR?

@samuelcolvin
Copy link
Owner Author

@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin commented Nov 30, 2018

Definitely new PR. If you'd like to do it that would be great. Otherwise I can.

Gr1N added a commit to Gr1N/pydantic that referenced this issue Jan 14, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants