feat: return Response from routes #346
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for robyn canceled.
|
|
@AntoineRR , this looks great :D I will try running it locally before a final merge. Before that, I have one question - Is there any change in how the files are rendered in the output? |
|
@AntoineRR , I just had a look. This looks great! |
|
Thanks for reviewing and merging it! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR makes
Responseapyclass.There is no more need to convert a
Pydictto aResponsein theexecute_http_functionmethod, as the result will already be aResponse.Can you tell me what you think of it @sansyrox ? 🙂