Violation of the code of conduct

[ghost]

This commit message violates the Sass Code of Conduct and Community Guidelines in several ways, particularly when considering the mistreatment of related issues and pull requests (mentioned below) by locking them without explaining, marking them as spam or "off topic" etc. The violations are:

1. Violation of Respect and Consideration: The Sass Code of Conduct stresses the importance of being considerate and respectful. It states that decisions should consider how they affect users and colleagues, and that disagreement is no excuse for poor manners. The commit message, especially the phrase "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," can be highly contentious and is considered as a call for the elimination of Israel. This phrase has been interpreted in various ways, with some viewing it as a call for Palestinian liberation and others as an incitement to political violence. Its inclusion in a technical project's commit message can be seen as inconsiderate to those who may view it as offensive or harmful, thus not respecting the diverse perspectives within the community.

2. Lack of Openness and Inviting Environment: The code encourages openness and an inviting environment, explicitly welcoming individuals regardless of their backgrounds or personal stances. By introducing politically charged statements into a project, it potentially alienates individuals who may have different views, thereby compromising the welcoming nature of the community.

3. Escalation of Disagreements: The code also emphasizes resolving disagreements constructively and involving leaders or the community in arbitration if necessary. The use of the site banner for making a political statement can be seen as bypassing community consensus, particularly if there have been many pull requests closed as spam or otherwise mistreated, indicating a possible disagreement on this or related issues within the community.

4. Potential Legal Issues: The phrase "from the river to the sea" is considered illegal in some European countries. This runs contrary to the guideline of taking responsibility for words and actions and ensuring that these do not harm others or the project itself.

5. Inclusivity and Non-Discrimination: The guidelines specifically state the importance of not allowing frustrations to turn into personal attacks and ensuring no one feels uncomfortable or threatened. If the project owner's commit message is perceived as aligning the project with specific political ideologies or movements, this could be seen as discriminating against those who do not share those views, potentially making them feel unwelcome or threatened.

It’s important to note that the Code of Conduct applies equally to all participants in the project, including the project owner and maintainers. As the ones who published and presumably endorsed the Code of Conduct, they are expected to adhere to its principles meticulously. In cases where the conduct of high-level project members is questioned, it is crucial for the health and integrity of the project that these concerns are addressed transparently and constructively, following the procedures outlined in the Code of Conduct.

These violations by the project owner not only undermine the stated principles of the Sass Code of Conduct but also risk reflecting negatively on the entire project. When the leadership fails to adhere to their own guidelines, it can significantly damage the project's reputation, making it appear unreliable and untrustworthy. Potential contributors, users, and stakeholders might view the project as a hostile or politically charged environment, which could deter participation and collaboration. This ultimately jeopardizes the project’s sustainability and growth, as a community-driven project thrives on inclusivity, respect, and collaborative effort.

Mentioned Issues and Pull Requests:
#1021 #1020 #1000 #999 #998 #997 #995 #994 #992 #991 #990 #989 #988 #981 #980 #978 #971 #970 #1004 #996 #977