Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

meta-ticket: Quasiquotes are no longer being improved #10755

Open
SethTisue opened this issue Mar 1, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

meta-ticket: Quasiquotes are no longer being improved #10755

SethTisue opened this issue Mar 1, 2018 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

SethTisue commented Mar 1, 2018

pull requests against quasiquote support (which has always been experimental) in scala.reflect will certainly be considered, but it's now been a long time since anyone has touched it. rather than leave a bunch of tickets open on it, let's just have this one

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

SethTisue commented Mar 1, 2018

closed the following quasiquotes tickets:

This was referenced Mar 1, 2018
@SethTisue SethTisue added this to the Backlog milestone Mar 1, 2018
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

SethTisue commented Mar 2, 2018

this has caused some angst on Gitter and Reddit. some clarifications:

  • pull requests on quasiquotes will still be considered
  • does this reflect a change in the maintenance/support status of quasiquotes/macros/reflect?
    • no. this is just backlog grooming, trying to not have so many stale tickets that nobody has looked at in years
  • why only close quasiquote tickets, not all macros/reflect tickets?
    • I singled out the quasiquotes tickets mainly because Denys used the issue tracker to record a lot of jottings and ideas, including vague future plans, so the average current relevance of the tickets was low. I'm also closing many stale macros and reflect tickets, just a bit more selectively. feel free to reopen, or suggest a reopen, on any individual ticket where you feel I was too hasty
  • does this affect Lightbend support customers?
    • no. macros are experimental, always have been, and therefore aren't officially covered by Lightbend support. as our customers know, we always do our best, regardless, to help with support tickets in this area, within reason. whether some tickets are open or closed doesn't represent any change to that. support customers can always ask us anything

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant