Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scaladoc doesn't show Source link of package objects, nor linear supertypes, or ordering and inherited filters #4976

Closed
scabug opened this Issue Sep 7, 2011 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@scabug
Copy link

scabug commented Sep 7, 2011

Scaladoc will show an abbreviated version of the page it shows for package objects. It doesn't display the source link, linear supertypes, or the filters for ordering and inherited. All these things are valid -- consider scala.sys.process, which extends a trait, for one example.

@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

scabug commented Sep 7, 2011

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4976?orig=1
Reporter: @dcsobral
Affected Versions: 2.9.2

@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

scabug commented Sep 7, 2011

@VladUreche said:
Simple test case:

// traits.scala
package test
trait A { def hi = "hello" }
trait B { def bye = "bye!" }
// test/package.scala
package object test extends A with B {
  override def hi = "good morning!"
  override def bye = "good bye!"
  protected def thank = "thank you!"
}
@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

scabug commented May 3, 2012

@kzys said:
scala/scala#470

The above modification will fix

  • linear supertypes
  • the filters for ordering and inherited.

but there is no source link yet.

@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

scabug commented Jan 18, 2013

@kzys said:
Opened an another pull request to add a source link.
scala/scala#1911

@scabug scabug closed this Feb 2, 2013

@scabug scabug added this to the 2.10.1 milestone Apr 7, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.