Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Precedence of infix operators in SLS (patch included) #5209

Closed
scabug opened this issue Nov 21, 2011 · 3 comments
Closed

Precedence of infix operators in SLS (patch included) #5209

scabug opened this issue Nov 21, 2011 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@scabug
Copy link

@scabug scabug commented Nov 21, 2011

Precedence of infix operators that starting with '=' or '!' is incorrectly listed in SLS (6.12.3 Infix Operations).
This was already confirmed ([http://groups.google.com/group/scala-language/msg/1bd28a7d3a39bf9c]) but still not fixed.

See also:

  • [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7022207/why-scala-changed-relative-precedence-of-relational-vs-equality-operators-compa]
  • [http://groups.google.com/group/scala-language/browse_thread/thread/51bde08394afb578]
  • [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7618923/actual-precedence-for-infix-operators-in-scala]
@scabug
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Nov 21, 2011

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-5209?orig=1
Reporter: Eugen Labun (labun)
Attachments:

Loading

@scabug
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Oct 15, 2013

@gkossakowski said:
Unassigning and rescheduling to M7 as previous deadline was missed.

Loading

@scabug scabug closed this Mar 12, 2014
@scabug
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Mar 12, 2014

@adriaanm said:
Fixed in markdown spec.

Loading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants