Skip to content

/ bug

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

pipeline clasfile building and writing (GenASM, GenBCode) #6164

Closed
scabug opened this issue Jul 31, 2012 · 9 comments
Closed

pipeline clasfile building and writing (GenASM, GenBCode) #6164

scabug opened this issue Jul 31, 2012 · 9 comments
Assignees
@lrytz
Labels
backend bytecode

Comments

@scabug
Copy link

@scabug scabug commented Jul 31, 2012

Some way should be devised to let the IDE know which thread is doing the classfile-writing.

Details in scala/scala#861
@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Jul 31, 2012

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-6164?orig=1
Reporter: @magarciaEPFL
@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Jan 23, 2013

@adriaanm said:
any thoughts on whether we could do this in 2.10.1 or should i retarget for 2.11?
@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Jan 23, 2013

@retronym said:
This sounds like .11 to me.
@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Jan 31, 2013

@adriaanm said:
It would be great if we could bring this back in the near future as it'll help with 2.11's theme of better compiler performance.
@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Jan 31, 2013

@dragos said:
I don't think there's a big issue to revert this in 2.10.1. We need to check, but I'm pretty sure there's no problem on the IDE side anymore.
@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Feb 10, 2014

@adriaanm said:
Since 2.11.0-RC1 is one week away, pushing all non-blockers without PR to 2.11.1-RC1. Please undo the change if I missed work in progress.
@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Aug 5, 2014

@gkossakowski said:
The 2.11.2 is out so I'm rescheduling the issue for 2.11.3.
@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Nov 4, 2014

@retronym said:
Updating fix-by version to 2.11.5.
@scabug scabug added this to the 2.12.3 milestone Apr 7, 2017
@lrytz lrytz modified the milestones: 2.12.4, 2.12.3 Jun 14, 2017
@SethTisue SethTisue removed the critical label Jul 27, 2017
@adriaanm adriaanm modified the milestones: 2.12.4, 2.12.5 Oct 10, 2017
@lrytz

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

@lrytz lrytz commented Mar 1, 2018

I haven't heard of this still being an issue. Can be repoened otherwise.
@lrytz lrytz closed this Mar 1, 2018
@lrytz lrytz removed this from the 2.12.5 milestone Mar 1, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lrytz lrytz

Labels
backend bytecode
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
4 participants
@scabug @lrytz @adriaanm @SethTisue
You can’t perform that action at this time.