Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rethink "value class parameter must be public" restriction #7859

Closed
scabug opened this issue Sep 18, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

Rethink "value class parameter must be public" restriction #7859

scabug opened this issue Sep 18, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@scabug
Copy link

@scabug scabug commented Sep 18, 2013

We allow the constructor to be declared private; we use makeNotPrivate to make it bytecode public and amendable to the peephole optimizations in posterasure.

Why not allow the same for the accessor?

@scabug
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Sep 18, 2013

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-7859?orig=1
Reporter: @retronym
Affected Versions: 2.10.0

@scabug
Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Sep 19, 2013

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants