-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Backport to branch(3.9) : Fix to put state even in read-only transactions #190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ | |
| import java.util.Optional; | ||
| import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach; | ||
| import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; | ||
| import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest; | ||
| import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.ValueSource; | ||
| import org.mockito.ArgumentCaptor; | ||
| import org.mockito.Mock; | ||
| import org.mockito.MockitoAnnotations; | ||
|
|
@@ -466,6 +468,7 @@ public void commit_EmptySnapshotGiven_ShouldDoNothing() | |
| CrudException { | ||
| // Arrange | ||
| when(config.isDirectAssetAccessEnabled()).thenReturn(false); | ||
| when(config.isTxStateManagementEnabled()).thenReturn(false); | ||
|
|
||
| // Act | ||
| ledger.commit(); | ||
|
|
@@ -482,6 +485,7 @@ public void commit_EmptySnapshotGivenAndDirectAssetAccessEnabled_ShouldDoNothing | |
| CrudException { | ||
| // Arrange | ||
| when(config.isDirectAssetAccessEnabled()).thenReturn(true); | ||
| when(config.isTxStateManagementEnabled()).thenReturn(false); | ||
|
|
||
| // Act | ||
| ledger.commit(); | ||
|
|
@@ -741,12 +745,14 @@ public void commit_CommitExceptionThrownInCommit_ShouldThrowDatabaseException() | |
| assertThat(proofs).containsOnly(proof); | ||
| } | ||
|
Comment on lines
745
to
746
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The original test @ParameterizedTest
@ValueSource(booleans = {true, false})
public void commit_WriteTransactionGiven_ShouldPutWithStateManagerAccordingToConfig(
boolean txStateManagementEnabled) |
||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void commit_TxStateManagementEnabled_ShouldPutWithStateManager() | ||
| @ParameterizedTest | ||
| @ValueSource(booleans = {true, false}) | ||
| public void commit_WriteTransactionGiven_ShouldPutWithStateManagerAccordingToConfig( | ||
| boolean txStateManagementEnabled) | ||
| throws CrudException, CommitException, | ||
| com.scalar.db.exception.transaction.UnknownTransactionStatusException { | ||
| // Arrange | ||
| when(config.isTxStateManagementEnabled()).thenReturn(true); | ||
| when(config.isTxStateManagementEnabled()).thenReturn(txStateManagementEnabled); | ||
| snapshot.put(ANY_ID, asset); | ||
| snapshot.put(ANY_ID, ANY_DATA); | ||
| doNothing().when(transaction).put(any(List.class)); | ||
|
|
@@ -758,32 +764,40 @@ public void commit_TxStateManagementEnabled_ShouldPutWithStateManager() | |
| ledger.commit(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Assert | ||
| verify(stateManager).putCommit(transaction, ANY_NONCE); | ||
| if (txStateManagementEnabled) { | ||
| verify(stateManager).putCommit(transaction, ANY_NONCE); | ||
| } else { | ||
| verify(stateManager, never()).putCommit(any(DistributedTransaction.class), anyString()); | ||
| } | ||
| verify(transaction).put(any(List.class)); | ||
| verify(transaction).put(any(Put.class)); | ||
| verify(transaction).commit(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void commit_TxStateManagementDisabled_ShouldNotPutWithStateManager() | ||
| @ParameterizedTest | ||
| @ValueSource(booleans = {true, false}) | ||
| public void commit_ReadOnlyTransactionGiven_ShouldPutWithStateManagerAccordingToConfig( | ||
| boolean txStateManagementEnabled) | ||
| throws CrudException, CommitException, | ||
| com.scalar.db.exception.transaction.UnknownTransactionStatusException { | ||
| // Arrange | ||
| when(config.isTxStateManagementEnabled()).thenReturn(false); | ||
| snapshot.put(ANY_ID, asset); | ||
| snapshot.put(ANY_ID, ANY_DATA); | ||
| doNothing().when(transaction).put(any(List.class)); | ||
| doNothing().when(transaction).put(any(Put.class)); | ||
| when(config.isTxStateManagementEnabled()).thenReturn(txStateManagementEnabled); | ||
| when(config.isDirectAssetAccessEnabled()).thenReturn(false); | ||
| when(transaction.getId()).thenReturn(ANY_NONCE); | ||
| doNothing().when(stateManager).putCommit(any(DistributedTransaction.class), anyString()); | ||
| snapshot.put(ANY_ID, asset); | ||
|
|
||
| // Act | ||
| ledger.commit(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Assert | ||
| verify(stateManager, never()).putCommit(transaction, ANY_NONCE); | ||
| verify(transaction).put(any(List.class)); | ||
| verify(transaction).put(any(Put.class)); | ||
| if (txStateManagementEnabled) { | ||
| verify(stateManager).putCommit(transaction, ANY_NONCE); | ||
| } else { | ||
| verify(stateManager, never()).putCommit(any(DistributedTransaction.class), anyString()); | ||
| } | ||
| verify(transaction, never()).put(any(List.class)); | ||
| verify(transaction, never()).put(any(Put.class)); | ||
| verify(transaction).commit(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Moving the
stateManager.putCommitcall after thetransaction.putcall ensures that the transaction state is updated only if the data is successfully written. This prevents inconsistencies where the transaction is marked as committed but the data is not actually persisted. This is a critical change to ensure data integrity.