Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete scalaz.concurrent. #2037

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 3, 2019

Conversation

@Milyardo
Copy link
Contributor

Milyardo commented Jan 28, 2019

It's 2019. Task still exists. With this PR that will no longer be the case.

scalaz.effect will likely be the next target for deletion.
@puffnfresh

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

puffnfresh commented Jan 28, 2019

👍 👍 👍

@hrhino hrhino requested a review from tonymorris Jan 28, 2019
@plokhotnyuk

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

plokhotnyuk commented Jan 28, 2019

Farewell, scalaz.concurrent!

But I'm not sure that Scala will ever have such efficient implementation of in-memory actors anymore...

@emilypi
emilypi approved these changes Feb 2, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

emilypi left a comment

👍 delete the ever-loving shit out of Task

@NeQuissimus NeQuissimus merged commit c7f2bda into scalaz:series/7.3.x Feb 3, 2019
1 check passed
1 check passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
@tonymorris

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

tonymorris commented Feb 3, 2019

👍 👍 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
6 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.