You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
<span property="rdfs:comment">A technique or technology used in a [[Dataset]] (or [[DataDownload]], [[DataCatalog]]),
corresponding to the method used for measuring the corresponding variable(s) (described using [[variableMeasured]]).
It is oriented towards scientific and scholarly dataset publication but may have broader applicability.
corresponding to the method used for measuring the corresponding variable(s) (described using [[variableMeasured]]). This is oriented towards scientific and scholarly dataset publication but may have broader applicability; it is not intended as a full representation of measurement, but rather as a high level summary for dataset discovery.
For example, if [[variableMeasured]] is: molecule concentration, [[measurementTechnique]] could be: "mass spectrometry" or "nmr spectroscopy" or "colorimetry" or "immunofluorescence".
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
works for me, lminor tweak on documentation:
it is meant to allow provision of a high level descriptor (keyword) of the measurement principle, not a full representation of the actual procedure or protocol. Terms from domain specific controlled terminology may be used.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would argue that it IS THE METHOD that we are capturing, as the examples show.
Why not just lose the "corresponding"'s and all the confusing lingo and just state:
The method, technique, or technology that was used to produce the measured variable.
320e711There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
works for me, lminor tweak on documentation:
it is meant to allow provision of a high level descriptor (keyword) of the measurement principle, not a full representation of the actual procedure or protocol. Terms from domain specific controlled terminology may be used.
320e711There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would argue that it IS THE METHOD that we are capturing, as the examples show.
Why not just lose the "corresponding"'s and all the confusing lingo and just state:
The method, technique, or technology that was used to produce the measured variable.