Supersedes or Superseded by not displayed for Types

[RichardWallis]

Only currently visible on attribute pages

[danbri]

I was pretty sure we had an issue for this, but I've not managed to find it yet :)

[danbri]

Merged the pull request. But do you handle if a type is superseded but not by any particular new term, i.e. obsolete/deprecated. I think that was the other issue I left open somewhere...

[danbri]

Ok this is live on webschemas.org - is there a good example we can look at to test?

[Dataliberate]

http://webschemas.org/CreativeWorkSeason
http://webschemas.org/Season

“do you handle if a type is superseded but not by any particular new term”

• would need to find an example to check

We should in addition probably display a warning near the top saying “This
term has been superseded by XXXX. Please consider before using”

~Richard.

Richard Wallis
Founder, Data Liberate
http://dataliberate.com
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
Twitter: @rjw

On 19 April 2016 at 16:36, Dan Brickley notifications@github.com wrote:

Ok this is live on webschemas.org - is there a good example we can look
at to test?

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1109 (comment)

[danbri]

We shouldn't make the warnings too heavy or it creates awkwardness e.g. when search marketing people have recommended something to their clients then it gets superseded. We want consumers to respect older structures wherever possible and not worry publishers into constantly updating in the absence of concrete product-related incentives imho.

[RichardWallis]

Fixed in V3.0

[unor]

do you handle if a type is superseded but not by any particular new term

would need to find an example to check

Maybe a relevant case is ProfessionalService? See #1418