Skip to content

Broaden the range of schema:version from Number to Text #1151

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
tfrancart opened this issue May 11, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Broaden the range of schema:version from Number to Text #1151

tfrancart opened this issue May 11, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels
schema.org vocab General top level tag for issues on the vocabulary type:cleanup + clarity Addresses wording fixes, ambiguities, confusion, bad examples etc

Comments

@tfrancart
Copy link
Contributor

schema:version on CreativeWork : "The version of the CreativeWork embodied by a specified resource."
Often versions are not only numbers, but might use patterns like "x.y.z" (major.minor.path), or use version names ("sdo-deimos"), etc.
@tfrancart tfrancart mentioned this issue May 11, 2016
Closed
@vickitardif
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@andyjenkinson
Copy link

+1 also, we are likely to use this for describing datasets

This was referenced Jul 18, 2016
Closed
Merged
@danbri danbri added schema.org vocab General top level tag for issues on the vocabulary type:exact proposal type:cleanup + clarity Addresses wording fixes, ambiguities, confusion, bad examples etc labels Jul 18, 2016
@danbri
Copy link
Contributor

danbri commented Jul 18, 2016

let's do it!

@danbri danbri closed this as completed in d3d7048 Jul 19, 2016
@danbri
Copy link
Contributor

danbri commented Jul 19, 2016

Implemented and queued for next release review: http://webschemas.org/docs/releases.html#g1151

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
schema.org vocab General top level tag for issues on the vocabulary type:cleanup + clarity Addresses wording fixes, ambiguities, confusion, bad examples etc
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@danbri @andyjenkinson @tfrancart @vickitardif