Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fileFormat assumes registered mediatypes - need an idiom for obscure formats #1191

Closed
danbri opened this issue May 31, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor

@danbri danbri commented May 31, 2016

#1083

usecase: describing scientific datasets where the formats are relatively obscure (but still known within their community). URLs to well known READMEs are often the best thing out there - how to express these in schema.org.

@agbeltran
Copy link

@agbeltran agbeltran commented Jun 1, 2016

For domains such as life sciences, there are resources such as BioSharing.org, which compile information about the standards (formats, ontologies, minimum information guidelines) used by different communities.

Vocabularies such as DCTerms have the notion of conformance to standards (e.g formats) - see http://purl.org/dc/terms/conformsTo.

An approach like this has been used in HCLS dataset description and the bioCADDIE DATS model (Github repo: https://github.com/biocaddie/WG3-MetadataSpecifications).

@tfrancart
Copy link
Contributor

@tfrancart tfrancart commented Jun 8, 2016

See also #1155 ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.