Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

identifier property needs an example #1488

Open
RichardWallis opened this issue Jan 24, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

identifier property needs an example #1488

RichardWallis opened this issue Jan 24, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!). schema.org vocab General top level tag for issues on the vocabulary

Comments

@RichardWallis
Copy link
Contributor

RichardWallis commented Jan 24, 2017

identifier property needs an example to demonstrate the use of PropertyValue for defining identifier types.

@RichardWallis RichardWallis added the schema.org vocab General top level tag for issues on the vocabulary label Jan 24, 2017
@RichardWallis RichardWallis self-assigned this Jan 24, 2017
@mfenner
Copy link

mfenner commented Mar 1, 2017

Do you need more examples? I could provide an example for DOI.

@Dataliberate
Copy link
Contributor

Dataliberate commented Mar 1, 2017

I have added a couple in Pull Request #1489, however more would be welcome.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 31, 2020

This issue is being tagged as Stale due to inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!). label Jul 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!). schema.org vocab General top level tag for issues on the vocabulary
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants