-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 838
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a new type EmployerReview as a more specific type of Review #1576
Comments
Do you have any ideas of who will sign up to use it?
guha
…On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Gordon Mackenzie ***@***.***> wrote:
We currently have Review <http://schema.org/Review> and I would like to
propose a new more specific type EmployerReview for reviews pertaining
organizations being reviewed by an employee.
Description: "A review written by a current or former employee of an
organization. The review is in the context of the organization as an
employer."
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1576>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFAlCtiWSBXOzoh6i3IgT8eAVjjzox86ks5rqtGQgaJpZM4MtmWz>
.
|
I don't in particular know offhand at the moment but it would be a great way to easily isolate job-related reviews from the default review markup of employers such as is available on sites that provide/allow posting of employee reviews. |
It would be good to get some folks from sites that have these kinds of
reviews involved in the design of the vocabulary.
guha
…On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Gordon Mackenzie ***@***.***> wrote:
I don't in particular know offhand at the moment but it would be a great
way to easily isolate job-related reviews from the default review markup of
employers such as is available on sites that provide/allow posting of
employee reviews.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1576 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFAlCvqYG1egSKCRizPAOfqlM-TDrCXJks5rqtfzgaJpZM4MtmWz>
.
|
@gmackenz Are we talking something like CompanyReviews like what Glassdoor.com etc. provides ? Those kind of EmployerReviews ? |
Let's route this into pending.schema.org for a while, to give time for publishers and consumers to unveil themselves. I am happy with this pattern of contextualized Review sub-types. It isn't elegant but it is simple for publishers and adds clarity. (@thadguidry - yeah I believe those kinds of reviews) |
@thadguidry — what @danbri said — I think those kind of sites could be excellent candidates for EmployerReview. |
@gmackenz I'll code this up. Do you have any definition text in mind, Gordon? |
Ah sorry, I see it now! |
Something like...
|
LGTM. Simple, short, to the point.
Gordon Mackenzie | Schema Wrangler (Ontologist) | gmackenz@google.com |
…On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Dan Brickley ***@***.***> wrote:
-> http://webschemas.org/EmployerReview
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1576 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEeZInPUY5lnb7XRE5GolI_Q9_CkABovks5r4gAZgaJpZM4MtmWz>
.
|
@danbri what if we sorta tweak the definition of reviewBody... "the main body section of the review". more Simple English. or do you think that will confuse with the term "main" and folks might think "what do I use for my other review sections?" |
Another one evidently...
Gordon Mackenzie | Schema Wrangler (Ontologist) | gmackenz@google.com |
…On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Thad Guidry ***@***.***> wrote:
@gmackenz <https://github.com/gmackenz> what ? I'm confused. Was your
comment here about LGTM supposed to land on this issue or another one ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1576 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEeZIpxyi0AlPE2TF675AZqxKRBgT_IWks5r6OAUgaJpZM4MtmWz>
.
|
This issue is being tagged as Stale due to inactivity. |
We currently have Review and I would like to propose a new more specific type EmployerReview for reviews pertaining organizations being reviewed by an employee.
Description: "A review written by a current or former employee of an organization. The review is in the context of the organization as an employer."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: