Currently we have to entity-escape HTML anchor syntax to link from the term definition to another schema.org term. We should consider a notation that makes this easier, less error prone, and readable in the RDFS. Perhaps there are conventions that could be borrowed from Markdown?
I don't see anything perfect in http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#link although foo is supposed to mean same as an 'em' HTML tag. So we could say if something is emphasised and it is the name of a schema.org term, it should be automatically hyperlinked in the site navigation.
(and yes, this post would have been more readable if github wasn't interpreting it as markdown)
Added format processing of comment fields see issue (#181)
For links within Schema.org site use [[target]] for example [[CreativeWork]] will result in <a href="/CreativeWork">Creative Work</a>
The markdown implementation fixes this. Thanks @RichardWallis