Add VisualArtwork vocabulary based on proposal #204

Closed
danbri opened this Issue Dec 15, 2014 · 6 comments

Projects

None yet

3 participants

@danbri danbri added this to the sdo-stantz release milestone Dec 15, 2014
@danbri
Contributor
danbri commented Dec 15, 2014

Needs a bit of work translating examples into other formats

@danbri
Contributor
danbri commented Dec 15, 2014
@danbri danbri added a commit that closed this issue Jan 22, 2015
@danbri danbri VisualArtwork proposal.
Fixes #204
5c47cfc
@danbri danbri closed this in 5c47cfc Jan 22, 2015
@danbri danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2015
@danbri danbri VisualArtwork summary for releases page.
Closed #204
a672583
@danbri danbri reopened this Jan 30, 2015
@danbri
Contributor
danbri commented Jan 30, 2015

Re-opened as labelled as 'implementing' due to a couple more details (from @tmarshbing):

  • #293 Added URL as an expected type (in addition to Text) to the VisualArtwork properties of "artform", "surface", and "material"
  • The descriptions for depth and height should probably be updated, too. If you look at http://sdo-stantz.appspot.com/VisualArtwork, the descriptions for depth, height, and width are each a little different. I think they should all be, “The {blah} of the item.”
@danbri danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2015
@danbri danbri width/height/depth are now "The {blah} of the item.",
i.e. without mentioning Product, Person or other specific earlier types.
For #204
bf79073
@danbri
Contributor
danbri commented Jan 30, 2015

I've attended to those last 2 details. @tmarshbing @lazaruscorporation how is it looking? are we done?

@lazaruscorporation
Contributor

@danbri looks good to me!

@tmarshbing

@danbri looks good to me, too. Closing it.

@tmarshbing tmarshbing closed this Jan 30, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment