Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Height above Sea Level #2104

Closed
njh opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 8 comments
Closed

Height above Sea Level #2104

njh opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@njh
Copy link

@njh njh commented Dec 17, 2018

Hi,

Is it possible to specify a Place's height above sea level?
I guess it would need to include unit (mine are measured in metres)

nick.

@Dataliberate
Copy link
Contributor

@Dataliberate Dataliberate commented Dec 17, 2018

@njh
Copy link
Author

@njh njh commented Dec 17, 2018

Ah, of course, thanks @Dataliberate!

It would be good to be explicit about the units for elevation:
https://schema.org/elevation

Metres v. fractions of a kilometre?
And I am sure Americans would try using Feet...

@Dataliberate
Copy link
Contributor

@Dataliberate Dataliberate commented Dec 17, 2018

@gmackenz
Copy link
Contributor

@gmackenz gmackenz commented Dec 17, 2018

The WGS 84 does seem to explicitly state values in meters.

@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link

@VladimirAlexiev VladimirAlexiev commented Dec 28, 2018

All CRS that I know seem to measure elevation in Meters. So I think a clarification to that effect is warranted.
@njh could you please edit the issue title appropriately?

If you supply it as a text, then things like 1,000m & 3,280ft would be understood by search engines I believe.

I doubt that very much, but Schema always allows Text.
So an example like "3280 ft" could be given, with a warning that the value may not be interpreted appropriately. I've removed the comma and added a space for easier parsing, eg https://ci.mines-stetienne.fr/lindt/index.html will actually interpret this correctly, but only in Jena and given an appropriate datatype, eg
"3280 ft"^^cdt:ucum

@RichardWallis
Copy link
Contributor

@RichardWallis RichardWallis commented Jan 16, 2019

Recommend description of elevation property should be enhanced thus:

The elevation of a location (WGS 84). Values are of the form ' '. E.g., '1,000 m', '3,200 ft'. Numbers alone should be assumed to be a value in metres.

nicolastorzec added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2019
nicolastorzec added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2019
Changed description of elevation per issue #2104
@njh
Copy link
Author

@njh njh commented Jan 25, 2019

Thanks for this improvement!

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor

@danbri danbri commented Mar 19, 2019

For reference, this is what we eventually put into the (very informal) w3c wgs84 basic geo vocab:

<rdf:Property rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#alt">
 <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#SpatialThing" />
 <rdfs:label>altitude</rdfs:label>
 <rdfs:comment>The WGS84 altitude of a SpatialThing (decimal meters above
 the local reference ellipsoid).</rdfs:comment>
</rdf:Property>

See https://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/ http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
7 participants