Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version 6.0 planning (goal: 2019-12-01) #2376

Closed
11 of 16 tasks
danbri opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 15 comments
Closed
11 of 16 tasks

Version 6.0 planning (goal: 2019-12-01) #2376

danbri opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 15 comments
Assignees
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).

Comments

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor

danbri commented Oct 23, 2019

Planning issue for 6.0

Candidate PRs for 6.0 release

@danbri danbri self-assigned this Oct 23, 2019
@philbarker
Copy link
Contributor

@danbri this month's contribution on JobPosting from TalentSignal group is PR #2385 Hopefully non-controversial.

@vholland
Copy link
Contributor

vholland commented Nov 13, 2019

I would like to add

@philbarker
Copy link
Contributor

philbarker commented Nov 15, 2019

I think this is good to go too:

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbri commented Nov 22, 2019

@WeaverStever
Copy link

PolicyPages seems non-controversial #2350

@vholland
Copy link
Contributor

vholland commented Dec 19, 2019

Is it too late to get in:

@gmackenz
Copy link
Contributor

gmackenz commented Dec 21, 2019

May I humbly mention two candidates for 6.0 as well?

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbri commented Dec 31, 2019

Running behind on this, but at least we know how 2020 will start! Thanks all...

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbri commented Jan 2, 2020

@vholland what happened to isResizable? #2398

danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2020
@danbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbri commented Jan 2, 2020

ok most of 6.0 is up at http://webschemas.org/docs/releases.html#v6.0 for review.

I still need to work on the datasets part (top of this page), plus improve the renaming of ProductReturn* to MerchantReturn* terms so that old descriptions point to newer.

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbri commented Jan 6, 2020

Update: I propose we come back to 'Revisit/improve work around funding esp of datasets, #383 /cc @chrisgorgo' later in the month for v7. I have a little more work to do on dataset funding then I think we're ready to declare 6.0 release candidate.

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbri commented Jan 7, 2020

I've been looking at the dataset (etc) funding piece (and whiteboard diagrams from discussion with @chrisgorgo). Since it is a complex pattern touching ~6 types I think it deserves writing up in a doc or dedicated issue for better sanity checking, including a properly worked example, so I'll postpone the implementation until next release.

@chrisgorgo
Copy link

Sounds ok to me, but pinging @natashafn for additional comments.

@natashafn
Copy link

Yep, sounds good.

@github-actions
Copy link

Stale issue message

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!). label Jul 16, 2020
@danbri danbri closed this as completed Jul 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants