New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve markup for e-commerce shipping options #2506
Comments
For additional context on what we've done at Google so far:
|
Having 'shipping location' as a concept might also be useful. An understanding of where items are being shipped from is often an influence on purchasing decisions. |
Richard,
Do you mean “made in Chile” and shipped from a warehouse in Atlanta? Where
something is shipping from is not always the same as where it comes from.
Your comment at first read seems to conflate these concepts. Is that your
intent?
…On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:20 PM Richard Wallis ***@***.***> wrote:
Having 'shipping location' as a concept might also be useful. An
understanding of where items are being shipped from is often an influence
on purchasing decisions.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2506 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAJ2JT5KRDOOT2IPLOKVVLRJDMT7ANCNFSM4LSXFWDA>
.
|
I mean shipped from a supplier somewhere. Example scenario 1: Example 2: In both cases knowing the location from whence the product is shipped would be helpful in deciding who to purchase from, and the risk to a safe and timely arrival. |
@RichardWallis @HughP - thanks. We may come back to these but my colleagues tell me there are some complexities. We can revisit "ships from" later if there are use cases. |
I do not understand the utility of Additionally (and I think relevant to the point above) this needs examples, especially as understanding how to mark up |
Stale issue message |
Following the source link (#2506) from https://schema.org/PostalCodeRangeSpecification: https://schema.org/PostalCodeRangeSpecification appears to be US-centric. Many countries use alpha-numeric postal codes. Would the following be considered OK for postal codes H2* and V2X 6E3 to V2X 6S4? Is "postalCodeEnd" optional? Logically, it should be to allow for everything that matches "postalCodeBegin"...
|
@danbri Can the product schema examples be updated to reflect changes? |
I don't get at all why we would mark up shipping destination at all? If a company sells internationally, the options could be endless! Google can access other linked data to calculate shipping based on browser location and shipper ( USPS, UPS, FedEx, etc all ). I don't see examples that require a certain amount to be spent to qualify for free shipping, either. |
@danbri Not sure if this is the right place to ask and suggest, but it seems like it. If I got this right the minimum for ShippingDeliveryTime is 1 day. No way to specify same day delivery for local delivery with average delivery time for a given Product, right? We could specify 0 days but I am not sure how that will be handled and some categories like food delivery usually is faster than retail delivery and I see no way to specify this food product = 40min and retail product = 1hour30min. Is this planned as the hyper local delivery business is growing and becoming more popular? Suggestion if introducing minutes isn't feasible would be a new tag for samedaydelivery:
|
danbri commentedMar 24, 2020
(this is a proposal from Google based on our experience using schema.org Product markup)
Motivation: When users search for and browse different products across the web, they often want to understand what kinds of shipping options might be available to them. It would be useful for Schema.org to have expressivity that allowed various merchants to describe their shipping policies, including cost and estimated delivery times according to delivery location. As always there are various levels of detail that might be made explicit.
Our suggestion is to start with something like the following:
Main concepts:
Plus these as "useful to have":
This initial version may not support dynamic pricing based on other dimensions, such as the item price or weight or dynamic carrier rates. These are consequently difficult here because of the vast number of potential edge cases, but more potentially could be supported in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: