-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 838
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add DefinedTerm as expected type to learningResourceType #2764
Comments
Looks good to me. I would make a similar change to |
+1 to adding |
I agree enabling a crosswalk between defined terms is a very good idea.
This brings-up one of the original ideas related to the AlignmentObject, to
be able to create more clarity in such a crosswalk between competency
frameworks. SKOS , ASN and CASE all allow and support types of correlations
and alignments between nodes of competency frameworks or any ontology. e.g.
exactMatchf, relatedTo, isPartOf, and even Broadens and Narrows. This seems
the correct way to deal with this important use case.
https://schema.org/AlignmentObject
…On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 5:25 AM Stuart Sutton ***@***.***> wrote:
+1 to adding DefinedTerm as an expected type to both learningResourceType
and educationalUse.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2764 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKCD5LRB24X64BQFWL2QI3SPKGDDANCNFSM4TR27DXA>
.
|
Fixed in V11.0 release. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello 👋
is it possible to add
DefinedTerm
as an expected type to http://schema.org/learningResourceType?Background is this:
My project is working as a metadata-hub for educational resources in Germany. We gather material from many different sources and some of them use different vocabularies for defining their learning resource types. We connect the different content sources in our hub, so they can interchange their material.
Problem is:
They will only accept material with metadata they can understand. Thus we are thinking of drawing relations between the vocabs in the background and give each player what they understand. Therefore we are handling
learningResourceType
entries as a http://schema.org/DefinedTerm. I guess that this could be a use case for other people as well, at least it is quite common to have controlled vocabularies for this property.An exemplary entry would look like this:
Thank you and looking forward to discussion!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: