-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 845
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding DefinedTerm as range for properties expecting also a URL or PropertyValue or Text (if it corresponds to a standard) #3250
Comments
YES! |
Discussion from bioschemas issue 594 created by @meier-rene |
Similar to the |
I strongly support this. I have created this issue at the issue board of the bioschemas community. A little bit of explanation: When we add structured data to scientific data we like to use the type Thats why I ask you to please add |
An Ethanologist would be the best range of options. Also, try Wiley College
of John Hopkins university. They finalized an entropy or multiple phenom
events which travel amongst the masses called Epilepsia and is derived from
the medical terms epileptic seizure.
I think schema.org should consider marketing their cause throughout the
University/Research contacts and bolster their cause considering the
entrepreneurial incline availability inside the United States crypto
currency stock market. There is no centralized banking constituent to
crypto however, there is an assistant which preceptors inscribes a
direction.
If somehow GIS and Scheme could become partners through Dublin Core, we
could teach humans how to be humanoids, per Amazon EC2 Elastic load
balancing that occurs in communication. I would appreciate seeing tech reps
being developed with these tools in middle school age and will fight to see
them compensated as they build their incentive as a Java courier literally.
Good day & Good luck—this project is interesting and exciting to
follow—Thank ALL of you for what you do and using the technology right...!
Carpe Diem CLOSURE DOSSIER
Christopher Spradling
…On Tue, Jan 24, 2023, 11:46 AM ljgarcia ***@***.***> wrote:
In Bioschemas <https://bioschemas.org/>, it has become a common practice
to use DefinedTerm whenever possible (e.g., to avoid ambiguity, increase
interoperability). However, DefinedTerm is not always an option as it is
not listed within the expected types for the range of a given property.
A specific case is measurementTechnique
<https://schema.org/measurementTechnique>. Some of the examples used for
that property could be found in well-known ontologies, i.e., DefinedTerm
would be ideal in those cases. How can we get DefinedTerm added as a range
for measurementTechnique <https://schema.org/measurementTechnique>?
More in general, properties with ranges such as URL, PropertyValue and
Text (when its use suggests a standard or enumeration) could benefit from
the addition of DefinedTerm to the range. How to get there?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3250>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFVNUTK2V6S3PKPW2TUJ4TWUAIODANCNFSM6AAAAAAUFMDXZY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Adds DefinedTerm to the range of measurementTechnique as discussed in schemaorg#3250
While I am wary of adding DefinedTerm indiscriminately across all of schema.org, it does make sense at least for measurementTechnique. Any others that are high priority to folks here? |
Done! This is in release 19.0, just pushed to the live site. |
Nearby (and still needing attention), #3125 |
@danbri-- @ljgarcia and @nsjuty are still in the process of reviewing properties that would benefit from having DefinedTerm in the range. So far, they have identified the following properties:
More details here: BioSchemas/specifications#618 (comment) |
@meier-rene @chrisspradling1980 @sneumann @jvandriel featureList is not in the list, see https://schema.org/DefinedTerm |
I noticed |
This issue is being nudged due to inactivity. |
From the side of NFDI4Biodiversity and after a discussion with @sneumann, we strongly support this effort especially for |
Example again, this time it is clickable: https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.952033?format=metadata_jsonld |
propertyID should take a DefinedTerm. SubjectOf doesn't make sense to me, why not use propertyID, its already available for sdo:PropertyValue? measurementTechnique already allows a DefinedTerm, the instrument URI information makes more sense there. here's a modified extract from @uschindler example:
|
additionalType should also take a DefinedTerm. |
This issue is being nudged due to inactivity. |
In Bioschemas, it has become a common practice to use DefinedTerm whenever possible (e.g., to avoid ambiguity, increase interoperability). However, DefinedTerm is not always an option as it is not listed within the expected types for the range of a given property.
A specific case is measurementTechnique. Some of the examples used for that property could be found in well-known ontologies, i.e., DefinedTerm would be ideal in those cases. How can we get DefinedTerm added as a range for measurementTechnique?
More in general, properties with ranges such as URL, PropertyValue and Text (when its use suggests a standard or enumeration) could benefit from the addition of DefinedTerm to the range. How to get there?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: