accessibilityHazard content #334

Closed
philwareham opened this Issue Feb 12, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@philwareham

The Schema.org site lists the following example content for accessibilityHazard...

<meta itemprop="accessibilityHazard" content="noFlashing"/>
<meta itemprop="accessibilityHazard" content="noMotionSimulation"/>
<meta itemprop="accessibilityHazard" content="noSound"/>

But the linked reference page WebSchemas wiki lists possible values lists them as follows...

<meta itemprop="accessibilityHazard" content="noFlashingHazard"/>
<meta itemprop="accessibilityHazard" content="noMotionSimulationHazard"/>
<meta itemprop="accessibilityHazard" content="noSoundHazard"/>

Which is the correct implementation? Thanks!

@danbri

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@danbri

danbri Feb 12, 2015

Contributor

@chaals can you take a look?

Contributor

danbri commented Feb 12, 2015

@chaals can you take a look?

@chaals

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chaals

chaals Jun 1, 2015

Contributor

It's listed "implemented on 10-100 pages". I suggest we change the schema.org content.

Contributor

chaals commented Jun 1, 2015

It's listed "implemented on 10-100 pages". I suggest we change the schema.org content.

@chaals

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chaals

chaals Jun 30, 2015

Contributor

Hopefully I'll make a pull request to do this.

Having hazard in the name seems better - not all flashing is a flashing hazard…

Contributor

chaals commented Jun 30, 2015

Hopefully I'll make a pull request to do this.

Having hazard in the name seems better - not all flashing is a flashing hazard…

@philwareham

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@philwareham

philwareham Jun 30, 2015

Makes sense to me, thanks!

Makes sense to me, thanks!

chaals pushed a commit to chaals/schemaorg that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2015

chaals
Hazards should be thingHazarad
Added the keyword as per the information out there. Closes #334

@chaals chaals assigned danbri and unassigned chaals Jun 30, 2015

@chaals

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chaals

chaals Jun 30, 2015

Contributor

Worky for you?

Contributor

chaals commented Jun 30, 2015

Worky for you?

@danbri

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@danbri

danbri Jun 30, 2015

Contributor

Alright, this is merged in and queued for the next release which I'd like to see out in a modest number of days...

Contributor

danbri commented Jun 30, 2015

Alright, this is merged in and queued for the next release which I'd like to see out in a modest number of days...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment