You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Although https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2015Apr/0060.html points out, some organizations might not have employees (e.g. a Residents' Association, or Anarchists Society, or many kinds of club), there are many kinds of organization for which an employee count is relevant.
Regarding Scope, let's keep this fix simple. Context: It is also worth noting that some organizations have important relationships other than employment, and that schema.org does not enumerate all such relations. For example, the students or alumni of a University are not employees. Similarly with companies and their owners, customers and contractors. If we were to attempt a general approach to counting, we would need to include time as a parameter (and probably model with Role). There are also some discussions around other count-related properties, which like numberOfEmployees are hardcoded for a particular measure at a particular time (e.g. see offerCount, ratingCount, upvoteCount, downvoteCount, answerCount, UserPlays, screenCount, answerCount, wordCount, reviewCount). The point of this paragraph is to argue that a simple fix is the best action at this point.
This is worth doing immediately, without delaying for any broader discussion of other relationship types (e.g. http://schema.org/member), time-indexing, etc. Note that there has also been some discussion about a generalized model for measurement, motivated by modeling concerns around sport, where many different kinds of thing are counted obsessively. See https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Measurement
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would make sense to include QuantitativeValue to the range of numberOfEmployees, for this will allow ranges (50 - 100 employees), or open intervals (up to 50, at least 5 employees).
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2015Apr/0059.html
why is the domain of http://schema.org/numberOfEmployees set to
schema:BusinessAudience? Shouldn't it be schema:Organization instead?
Although https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2015Apr/0060.html points out, some organizations might not have employees (e.g. a Residents' Association, or Anarchists Society, or many kinds of club), there are many kinds of organization for which an employee count is relevant.
Regarding Scope, let's keep this fix simple. Context: It is also worth noting that some organizations have important relationships other than employment, and that schema.org does not enumerate all such relations. For example, the students or alumni of a University are not employees. Similarly with companies and their owners, customers and contractors. If we were to attempt a general approach to counting, we would need to include time as a parameter (and probably model with Role). There are also some discussions around other count-related properties, which like numberOfEmployees are hardcoded for a particular measure at a particular time (e.g. see offerCount, ratingCount, upvoteCount, downvoteCount, answerCount, UserPlays, screenCount, answerCount, wordCount, reviewCount). The point of this paragraph is to argue that a simple fix is the best action at this point.
Proposal:
This is worth doing immediately, without delaying for any broader discussion of other relationship types (e.g. http://schema.org/member), time-indexing, etc. Note that there has also been some discussion about a generalized model for measurement, motivated by modeling concerns around sport, where many different kinds of thing are counted obsessively. See https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Measurement
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: