You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I commented offtopic in the pull request, while meaning to comment offtopic in the issue :)
"Thanks! I was wondering if this should be attached more widely, but talked myself out of it.
If someone applies a 'lyrics' property to a thing typed only as e.g. VideoObject, some validators would probably complain. I think instead of adding 'lyrics' up at a safer generic level we should try to make the culture of schema.org validation softer. A reasonable interpretation of "x is a VideoObject and it has a lyrics property whose value is y" would be to conclude "oh, x is also probably a MusicComposition then". I don't believe its reasonable to require that every usage of "lyrics" on a VideoObject also requires the mention of a 2nd type, MusicComposition. This just adds weight for limited benefit."
MusicComposition has a
lyricist
property, but not alyrics
property. It would be nice to be able to specify the lyrics themselves.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: