New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CODE: Site should handle /Person/Xyz more gracefully #6

Closed
danbri opened this Issue Apr 17, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@danbri
Contributor

danbri commented Apr 17, 2014

We encourage people to use /-based extensions, so these shouldn't 404.

Possible designs include:

  1. redirect to http://schema.org/Person#Xyz and have .js notice the fragment
  2. make a stub page with a hyperlink back to /Person
@danbri

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment

@danbri danbri changed the title from Site should handle /Person/Xyz more gracefully to CODE: Site should handle /Person/Xyz more gracefully Jun 15, 2014

@danbri danbri added the python code label Jun 16, 2014

@danbri

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@danbri

danbri Jul 7, 2014

Contributor

Also the foo-input notation used with Action types...

Contributor

danbri commented Jul 7, 2014

Also the foo-input notation used with Action types...

@danbri

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@danbri

danbri Aug 12, 2014

Contributor

Regarding actions notation, http://schema.org/docs/actions.html is now on the site.

Contributor

danbri commented Aug 12, 2014

Regarding actions notation, http://schema.org/docs/actions.html is now on the site.

danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2014

Merge pull request #6 from vholland/sdo-itemlist
Added example for an entity that is both an ItemList and a CreativeWork

@danbri danbri modified the milestone: sdo-venkman release Oct 12, 2014

@danbri

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@danbri

danbri Jan 26, 2015

Contributor

see also #284

Contributor

danbri commented Jan 26, 2015

see also #284

@danbri

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@danbri

danbri May 6, 2015

Contributor

Ok, I've made a pass at both of these features. /cc @rvguha

Contributor

danbri commented May 6, 2015

Ok, I've made a pass at both of these features. /cc @rvguha

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment