New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auto.schema.org review tracking #704

Open
danbri opened this Issue Aug 6, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@danbri
Contributor

danbri commented Aug 6, 2015

This issue tracks final review comments on the auto.schema.org extension (see parent issue, #509).

Known unresolved issues at time of publication:

  • consider renaming specialUsage as vehicleSpecialUsage, or broaden its definition - #705
  • consider renaming seatingCapacity as vehicleSeatingCapacity or broaden its definition - #706
@danbri

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@danbri

danbri Oct 1, 2015

Contributor

/cc @mfhepp

Contributor

danbri commented Oct 1, 2015

/cc @mfhepp

@mfhepp

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mfhepp

mfhepp Oct 2, 2015

Contributor

Solved via #825

seatingCapacity and specialUsage are now defined in a way that fits other types of objects than vehicles.
seatingCapacity may also be useful for buildings, boats, classrooms, etc.
specialUsage may also be useful for other types of products, namely real estate objects.

We may want to move the definition of these elements to schema.org core once they are added to other types. For the moment, I suggest to keep them in the auto extension and expand their range in a second step.


martin hepp http://www.heppnetz.de
mhepp@computer.org @mfhepp

On 01 Oct 2015, at 12:48, Dan Brickley notifications@github.com wrote:

/cc @mfhepp


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Contributor

mfhepp commented Oct 2, 2015

Solved via #825

seatingCapacity and specialUsage are now defined in a way that fits other types of objects than vehicles.
seatingCapacity may also be useful for buildings, boats, classrooms, etc.
specialUsage may also be useful for other types of products, namely real estate objects.

We may want to move the definition of these elements to schema.org core once they are added to other types. For the moment, I suggest to keep them in the auto extension and expand their range in a second step.


martin hepp http://www.heppnetz.de
mhepp@computer.org @mfhepp

On 01 Oct 2015, at 12:48, Dan Brickley notifications@github.com wrote:

/cc @mfhepp


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@mfhepp

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mfhepp

mfhepp Nov 18, 2015

Contributor

It seems that the current status is that specialUsage is defined in the extension and seatingCapacity has been renamed vehicleSeatingCapacity and is defined in the core.

So what is left to be done is

Then we should be all set for the final release of the auto extension and this issue should be closed.

Contributor

mfhepp commented Nov 18, 2015

It seems that the current status is that specialUsage is defined in the extension and seatingCapacity has been renamed vehicleSeatingCapacity and is defined in the core.

So what is left to be done is

Then we should be all set for the final release of the auto extension and this issue should be closed.

@danbri danbri changed the title from auto.schema.org final review tracking to auto.schema.org review tracking Nov 18, 2015

@danbri

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@danbri

danbri Nov 18, 2015

Contributor

specialUsage needs some attention - see #705 (and #898)

Contributor

danbri commented Nov 18, 2015

specialUsage needs some attention - see #705 (and #898)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment