Let's rename containedIn to containedInPlace too.
I am fine with that, but I do not think it is too annoying as it stands ;-)
Note that we are using containedIn in the hotel proposal, so there is a potential merge conflict if you change the name at the time of adding my proposal.
Fix for #811 - gave containedIn a more Place-related name, and an inv…
Since most markup using this will start with the larger, outer place, this was long overdue.
... queued up at http://sdo-phobos.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#geo-contains PTAL
Looks OK to me, but again, providing crossrefs between containedInPlace and containsPlace seems sensible
Thanks @chaals crossrefs in this case are built in, since we declare them to be inverses of each other - see links above
Queued for closure after next release. http://sdo-phobos.appspot.com/containedInPlace
Fixed in http://schema.org/docs/releases.html#v2.2 - thanks all