Skip to content

Schema Review microdata example doesn't use reviewBody #881

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
inetbiz opened this issue Nov 7, 2015 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2687
Closed

Schema Review microdata example doesn't use reviewBody #881

inetbiz opened this issue Nov 7, 2015 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2687
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).

Comments

@inetbiz
Copy link

inetbiz commented Nov 7, 2015

I was looking at https://schema.org/Review today. I noticed the microdata example uses description instead of reviewBody.

@unor
Copy link
Contributor

unor commented Nov 28, 2015

I think you’re right, reviewBody should be used there instead of description, as these seem to be the actual/complete reviews.

#909

@dandv
Copy link

dandv commented Jun 12, 2016

@inetbiz, actually all formats in Example 1 use description. Example 2 uses reviewBody.

@danbri, can you take a look please? Our Embedded review sample at dgc/search/data-types uses reviewBody, so I went with that for this recipe sample.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is being tagged as Stale due to inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!). label Aug 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants