Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Schema Review microdata example doesn't use reviewBody #881

Closed
inetbiz opened this issue Nov 7, 2015 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2687
Closed

Schema Review microdata example doesn't use reviewBody #881

inetbiz opened this issue Nov 7, 2015 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2687
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).

Comments

@inetbiz
Copy link

inetbiz commented Nov 7, 2015

I was looking at https://schema.org/Review today. I noticed the microdata example uses description instead of reviewBody.
@unor unor mentioned this issue Nov 28, 2015
Closed
@unor
Copy link
Contributor

unor commented Nov 28, 2015

I think you’re right, reviewBody should be used there instead of description, as these seem to be the actual/complete reviews.

→ #909

@unor unor mentioned this issue Feb 26, 2016
Closed
18 tasks
@dandv
Copy link

dandv commented Jun 12, 2016 •
edited

@inetbiz, actually all formats in Example 1 use description. Example 2 uses reviewBody.

@danbri, can you take a look please? Our Embedded review sample at dgc/search/data-types uses reviewBody, so I went with that for this recipe sample.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 12, 2020

This issue is being tagged as Stale due to inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!). label Aug 12, 2020
@RichardWallis RichardWallis mentioned this issue Aug 12, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Changed review/description to reviewBody in example eg-0010 schemaorg/schemaorg
3 participants
@dandv @inetbiz @unor