-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 825
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove @value from datePublished in Periodical JSON-LD examples #904
Comments
dbs
added a commit
to dbs/schemaorg
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2015
The JSON-LD examples for ScholarlyArticle included unnecessary @value clauses due to a naive conversion from the RDFa source. Remove them, so instead of: "datePublished": { "@value": "2006-10", "@type": "xsd:gYearMonth" }, we'll have the much simpler, easier to publish and consume: "datePublished": "2006-10", Fixes schemaorg#904. Signed-off-by: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
See dbs@8ecbfe0 for a commit that resolves this issue. |
18 tasks
+1 |
@dbs - can you send a PR against our master branch? I tried to figure a way to do this without bugging you but have totally failed! |
dbs
added a commit
to dbs/schemaorg
that referenced
this issue
Dec 9, 2015
The JSON-LD examples for ScholarlyArticle included unnecessary @value clauses due to a naive conversion from the RDFa source. Remove them, so instead of: "datePublished": { "@value": "2006-10", "@type": "xsd:gYearMonth" }, we'll have the much simpler, easier to publish and consume: "datePublished": "2006-10", Fixes schemaorg#904. Signed-off-by: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
Fixed in #926 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
As noted by @Aaranged and related to #903, the JSON-LD examples for Periodical / ScholarlyArticle examples currently contain unnecessary
@value
stanzas that complicate the otherwise straightforward datePublished attributes. These should be removed.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: