New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR for Issue 1743 #1744

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 27, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@tfrancart
Contributor

tfrancart commented Sep 20, 2017

See #1743

  • deleted inverse properties
  • Changed definition of "Legislation" to make it clear this is a document
  • Fixed Range on legislationType (CategoryCode)
  • Added legislationJurisdiction as a subproperty of spatialCoverage
  • Fixed Definitive into DefinitiveLegalValue to align with other values
  • expanded the definition of legislationIdentifier to clarify that it can apply to string or URIs
  • fixed and adjusted the examples accordingly (But I still don't know how to express inverse properties in microdata)
- deleted inverse properties
		- Changed definition of "Legislation" to make it clear this is a document
		- Fixed Range on legislationType (CategoryCode)
		- Added legislationJurisdiction as a subproperty of spatialCoverage
		- Fixed Definitive into DefinitiveLegalValue to align with other values
		- expanded the definition of legislationIdentifier to clarify that it can apply to string or URIs
		- fixed and adjusted the examples accordingly

@tfrancart tfrancart changed the title from Issue 1743 to PR for Issue 1743 Sep 20, 2017

@danbri

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

danbri commented Sep 27, 2017

Could you file a separate bug to get some decent inverse property examples in Microdata? /cc @chaals

@danbri danbri merged commit fe88367 into schemaorg:master Sep 27, 2017

1 check passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment