Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "name" properties for CreativeWork examples #190

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dbs
Copy link
Contributor

@dbs dbs commented Dec 9, 2014

As pointed out by Martin Hepp, several of the types in the CreativeWork
examples are missing "name" properties, resulting in empty, typed
entities without any sort of attached property. That's worse than a
blank node; call it a void node, maybe ;)

Signed-off-by: Dan Scott dan@coffeecode.net

As pointed out by Martin Hepp, several of the types in the CreativeWork
examples are missing "name" properties, resulting in empty, typed
entities without any sort of attached property. That's worse than a
blank node; call it a void node, maybe ;)

Signed-off-by: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
@danbri danbri added guidelines docs examples Work on our supporting materials rather than on schema definitions type:enhancement labels Jan 22, 2015
@danbri danbri added this to the sdo-stantz release milestone Jan 22, 2015
@danbri danbri self-assigned this Jan 22, 2015
@danbri
Copy link
Contributor

danbri commented Jan 22, 2015

Merged via #278 - thanks again, Dan!

@danbri danbri closed this Jan 22, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
guidelines docs examples Work on our supporting materials rather than on schema definitions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants