We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When doing multi analysis it writes each schema to a directory named by the schema:
schemaspy/src/main/java/org/schemaspy/SchemaAnalyzer.java
Lines 165 to 166 in 90ac4f8
When linking in DotNode the method Table.getContainer() is used:
Table.getContainer()
schemaspy/src/main/java/org/schemaspy/output/dot/schemaspy/DotNode.java
Lines 78 to 87 in 90ac4f8
This logic isn't identical to the creation of the directory structure.
schemaspy/src/main/java/org/schemaspy/model/Table.java
Line 79 in 90ac4f8
This works since it checks the schema first, and there is a restriction that schema must exist when analyzing.
But there might exist an issue with MSSQLServer, since I believe that you can have two catalogs that both contain schemas with the same name.
catA.schemaA and catB.schemaB, same thing might exist for pgsql.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
When doing multi analysis it writes each schema to a directory named by the schema:
schemaspy/src/main/java/org/schemaspy/SchemaAnalyzer.java
Lines 165 to 166 in 90ac4f8
When linking in DotNode the method
Table.getContainer()
is used:schemaspy/src/main/java/org/schemaspy/output/dot/schemaspy/DotNode.java
Lines 78 to 87 in 90ac4f8
This logic isn't identical to the creation of the directory structure.
schemaspy/src/main/java/org/schemaspy/model/Table.java
Line 79 in 90ac4f8
This works since it checks the schema first, and there is a restriction that schema must exist when analyzing.
But there might exist an issue with MSSQLServer, since I believe that you can have two catalogs that both contain schemas with the same name.
catA.schemaA and catB.schemaB, same thing might exist for pgsql.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: