Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MRG] MAINT compatibility sklearn 0.20 -> wait for next release #379

Merged
merged 20 commits into from Sep 4, 2018

Conversation

glemaitre
Copy link
Member

Reference Issue

closes #371

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Any other comments?

@glemaitre glemaitre mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2017
4 tasks
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 1, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #379 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 92.94%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #379      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.74%   98.75%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          75       75              
  Lines        4543     4503      -40     
==========================================
- Hits         4486     4447      -39     
+ Misses         57       56       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
imblearn/combine/_smote_tomek.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
imblearn/metrics/_classification.py 96.72% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
imblearn/ensemble/_balance_cascade.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
imblearn/pipeline.py 97.07% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
imblearn/combine/_smote_enn.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
imblearn/tests/test_common.py 95% <100%> (-0.46%) ⬇️
imblearn/utils/estimator_checks.py 96.44% <100%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
imblearn/ensemble/tests/test_bagging.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
imblearn/datasets/_zenodo.py 96.87% <50%> (-1.59%) ⬇️
imblearn/datasets/_imbalance.py 91.3% <50%> (-8.7%) ⬇️
... and 1 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fe51ca3...b49707d. Read the comment docs.

@massich
Copy link
Contributor

massich commented Dec 1, 2017

This crashes all over the place, 'cos the CI's still install scikit-learn 0.19, should not we wait until release? Or at least pip install from master?

@glemaitre
Copy link
Member Author

glemaitre commented Dec 1, 2017 via email

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Sep 3, 2018

Hello @glemaitre! Thanks for updating the PR.

Cheers ! There are no PEP8 issues in this Pull Request. 🍻

Comment last updated on September 04, 2018 at 15:01 Hours UTC

@glemaitre glemaitre merged commit c0a4208 into scikit-learn-contrib:master Sep 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fixes for scikit-learn 0.20
3 participants