New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] FIX: avoid densifying sparse matrix before inverse_transform of OHE #495

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 6, 2018

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@glemaitre
Member

glemaitre commented Nov 6, 2018

closes #493

@pep8speaks

This comment has been minimized.

pep8speaks commented Nov 6, 2018

Hello @glemaitre! Thanks for submitting the PR.

@codecov

This comment has been minimized.

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #495 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #495   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.86%   98.86%           
=======================================
  Files          82       82           
  Lines        5020     5020           
=======================================
  Hits         4963     4963           
  Misses         57       57
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
imblearn/over_sampling/_smote.py 97.24% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f17107e...1f5506f. Read the comment docs.

@glemaitre glemaitre merged commit 0c4548a into scikit-learn-contrib:master Nov 6, 2018

6 checks passed

LGTM analysis: Python No alert changes
Details
ci/circleci: python3 Your tests passed on CircleCI!
Details
codecov/patch 100% of diff hit (target 98.86%)
Details
codecov/project 98.86% (+0%) compared to f17107e
Details
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment