You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I really think we should not vendor sphinx-gallery. It created a whole host of problems for trying to do the 0.18.2 release. I don't really see a benefit in vendoring it, given that we can always pin the version in the CI.
We could even require a particular version in our conf.py, but the version of sphinxgallery you need is much more dependent on the version of sphinx then the version of scikit-learn.
Since we don't vendor sphinx (and we really shouldn't), vendoring sphinxgallery will break things.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sphinx will break sphinx-gallery again in the next sphinx release, see sphinx-gallery/sphinx-gallery#270, which means at the next release of sphinx, 0.19 docs will not build any more if we decide to vendor again.
I really think we should not vendor sphinx-gallery. It created a whole host of problems for trying to do the 0.18.2 release. I don't really see a benefit in vendoring it, given that we can always pin the version in the CI.
We could even require a particular version in our conf.py, but the version of sphinxgallery you need is much more dependent on the version of sphinx then the version of scikit-learn.
Since we don't vendor sphinx (and we really shouldn't), vendoring sphinxgallery will break things.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: