Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MRG] Fixed whatsnew and tiny docstring fix #12669

Merged
merged 14 commits into from Nov 27, 2018

Conversation

marctorsoc
Copy link
Contributor

Reference Issues/PRs

As mentioned in PR #12613 , what's new cannot reference private API, so fixing this

Also, while documenting found that fit_grid_point always fits only test, so changed the return part of the docstring

methods :func:`cross_val_score`, :func:`cross_val_predict`,
:func:`cross_validate`, now print train scores when `return_train_scores` is
True and `verbose` > 2. For :func:`learning_curve`, and :func:`validation_curve`
only the latter is required.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a whitespace

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is it ok now?

@amueller
Copy link
Member

The test failure is very suspicious. https://travis-ci.org/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/jobs/459951142

@amueller
Copy link
Member

oh it's #12674 nevermind

methods :func:`cross_val_score`, :func:`cross_val_predict`,
:func:`cross_validate`, now print train scores when `return_train_scores` is
True and `verbose` > 2. For :func:`learning_curve`, and :func:`validation_curve`
only the latter is required.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The indentation isn't right. Please keep the same indent as others entries.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for the comment, corrected

Copy link
Contributor

@eamanu eamanu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Like say @amueller, your CI fail for #12674

Copy link
Member

@jnothman jnothman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay :)

@jnothman jnothman merged commit c49a5bf into scikit-learn:master Nov 27, 2018
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
koenvandevelde pushed a commit to koenvandevelde/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
@marctorsoc marctorsoc deleted the fixed_whatsnew branch February 26, 2022 02:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants