[MRG] multilabel accuracy with jaccard the index #1795
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Had a quick look..looks cool so far. Nice work |
Thanks for you encouragements! :-) |
| score = np.array([len(set(true) ^ set(pred)) == 0 | ||
| for pred, true in zip(y_pred, y_true)]) | ||
|
|
||
| elif similarity == "jaccard": |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why don't you create a new dedicated function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the multilabel litterature, subset accuracy and jaccard index accuracy are often simply called accuracy.
They will give the same score in the multiclass case.
And I think that it would reduce the amount of redundant code.
Note: the hamming loss metrics could be integrate in the accuracy score function with the hamming similarity.
Note2 : I got inspired to do this with the design of the precision, recall, f-score function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I too would prefer a new function, say jaccard_accuracy. Redundant code isn't the first worry: it's consistent and easy to use APIs. The implementation can always be changed later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks a lot for the feedback ! I will do as you propose.
|
What do you think of the interface of Given the new interface, I would like to merge the hamming loss function in the |
|
I have written the narrative doc and finished to implement the new jaccard metric. |
|
I am not able to retrieve the travis log :-( |
|
Travis should be happy now. |
|
I've rebased on top of master |
|
Reviews are welcomed. |
|
Nice! I'll have a read through this evening. Thanks |
|
Thanks :-) |
|
Read through this. Very nice PR.. |
|
Thanks for the review ! :-) |
| >>> y_pred = [0, 2, 1, 3] | ||
| >>> y_true = [0, 1, 2, 3] | ||
| >>> jaccard_similarity_score(y_true, y_pred) | ||
| 0.5 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If y_pred and y_true are sets, shouldn't the score be 1.0 in this case? (Both y_pred and y_true contains the same labels, modulo their order, but this shouldn't be of importance since we are talking about sets, should it?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okat, I get it, y_true[i] and y_pred[i] are the sets to be compared. I think this should be make clearer then: jaccard_similarity_score computes the average (?) Jaccard similarity (as you define it above) over several pairs of sets.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve the doc in 7267e3c
|
Besides my comments above, this looks good to me. +1 after those are fixed. |
|
If everything is ok, I can squash and push. |
|
👍 |
|
Thanks a lot for the review !!! |
|
|
I'm looking for the bug. |
|
Oddly with python 2.6 and numpy 1.3, I got : instead of patch is coming. |
|
For reference, this is a new step to solve #558. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pr intends to bring multilabel accuracy and zero-one loss based on the jaccard index.
For reference, see section 7.1.1 of Mining Multi-label Data and the Wikipedia entry on Jaccard index.
TODO list:
This was removed of the pr scope: