Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uncertainty Modeling with SymPy Stats #29

Closed
wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@mrocklin
Copy link

commented Jul 16, 2012

This is an article submission for

Symbolic Statistics with SymPy
by
Matthew Rocklin

This draft is fairly rough. It will improve in the next few days.

Tasks

  • Add images
  • Add references
  • Add internal citations
  • Clean up language
@stefanv

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Jul 16, 2012

@mrocklin Paper does not compile... missing images.

@mrocklin

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

commented Jul 16, 2012

Away from a computer today. I'll try to push those in sometime early
tomorrow. As a warning few of them are rough and will be refined in the
next couple days.

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Stefan van der Walt <
reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

@mrocklin Paper does not compile... missing images.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#29 (comment)

@mrocklin

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

commented Jul 16, 2012

Got to this this morning. Images Added.

@stefanv

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Jul 16, 2012

@mrocklin Thanks, the paper now compiles.

@stefanv

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Dec 28, 2012

Merged.

@stefanv stefanv closed this Dec 28, 2012

sbenthall pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2016

Merge pull request #29 from MDAnalysis/large_sys_Tyler
Large System Information -- Viral Envelopes

mpacer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2017

2017 optimizations (#29)
* Addressed reviewer's feedback. Adjusted narative after changing the code snipped in the earlier commit.

Used double back quotes for code, some earlier used single quotes. Shortened variable name in the function definition,
spelled out JIT on its first usage.

* implemented reviewer's suggestion to explain what aligned memory means for uninitiated

* acting on reviewer's remark: 'well known' -> 'well-known'

fixed typo, introduced while fixing another typo

* reviewer's feedback: ''compiled to fast native code' -> 'compiled to native code'

mpacer pushed a commit to mpacer/scipy_proceedings that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2018

2017 optimizations (scipy-conference#29)
* Addressed reviewer's feedback. Adjusted narative after changing the code snipped in the earlier commit.

Used double back quotes for code, some earlier used single quotes. Shortened variable name in the function definition,
spelled out JIT on its first usage.

* implemented reviewer's suggestion to explain what aligned memory means for uninitiated

* acting on reviewer's remark: 'well known' -> 'well-known'

fixed typo, introduced while fixing another typo

* reviewer's feedback: ''compiled to fast native code' -> 'compiled to native code'

deniederhut pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.