-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
constructor, initializer → __init__ method #4086
Labels
Comments
I would like to give this a shot, if it's alright 😄 |
ammarnajjar
added a commit
to ammarnajjar/scrapy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2019
ammarnajjar
added a commit
to ammarnajjar/scrapy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2019
ammarnajjar
added a commit
to ammarnajjar/scrapy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2019
ammarnajjar
added a commit
to ammarnajjar/scrapy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2019
ammarnajjar
added a commit
to ammarnajjar/scrapy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2019
ammarnajjar
added a commit
to ammarnajjar/scrapy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2019
ammarnajjar
added a commit
to ammarnajjar/scrapy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2019
ammarnajjar
added a commit
to ammarnajjar/scrapy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2019
Issue scrapy#4086 Co-Authored-By: Mikhail Korobov <kmike84@gmail.com>
ammarnajjar
added a commit
to ammarnajjar/scrapy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There are several places in the documentation and comments where we use the words ‘constructor’ or ‘initializer’ to refer to the
__init__
method of a class. We should change the wording to explicitly say ‘__init__
method’ instead.Related to #2354.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: