chore(backlog): add YYYY-MM-DD to CC-027/028/034 Outcome lines#62
Merged
Merged
Conversation
CC-030 strengthened closure-date rule (heading marker OR **Outcome**: line only) exposes drift: CC-027 and CC-028 Outcome lines lacked a date token (previously masked by Source-line dates), and CC-034 had no Outcome line at all. Add `2026-05-15 —` prefix to existing CC-027 / CC-028 Outcome lines. Add a new Outcome line for CC-034 (dated 2026-05-15, summarizing PR #53 landing). No semantic change to history; only date metadata needed by the strengthened validator. Verified against the strengthened validator (from feat/cc030 branch): emits only the pre-existing 3 token set (E-AREA-ENUM, E-REFS-PREFIX, E-INDEX-MISMATCH). No new errors introduced. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2 tasks
screenleon
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2026
CC-030 fix-round-3 tightens the **Outcome** fallback regex to require YYYY-MM-DD immediately after the `**Outcome**: ` literal. CC-029's Outcome line currently reads "**Outcome**: PR #57 合併 2026-05-15; ..." — date is mid-sentence, no longer satisfies the closure-date evidence under the tightened rule. Reorder to "**Outcome**: 2026-05-15 — PR #57 合併; ...", matching the canonical shape used by CC-027/028/034 in PR #62. Verified against the strengthened validator from feat/cc030: token set returns to the pre-existing 3-token baseline (E-AREA-ENUM, E-REFS-PREFIX, E-INDEX-MISMATCH). Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
3 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Backfill date tokens on closed-entry Outcome lines so they pass the strengthened closure-date rule landing in CC-030.
2026-05-15 —2026-05-15 —2026-05-15Why
CC-030 fix-round-1 (gate-20260516-195358 NO-GO follow-up) tightens E-CLOSURE-DATE-MISMATCH so the body-side closure date must appear in either a heading marker (
✅ YYYY-MM-DD) OR a**Outcome**:line. The previous loose rule (any date anywhere in the section) was masking real drift on CC-027/028/034 — their Source lines coincidentally carried2026-05-15dates that the validator picked up.Data-prep PR landed before the strengthened validator so main never goes through a state where validator output gains new tokens unexpectedly.
Test plan
bash /tmp/validate-new.sh BACKLOG.md(strengthened validator from feat/cc030) → only pre-existing 3 token set (E-AREA-ENUM, E-REFS-PREFIX, E-INDEX-MISMATCH). No new closure-date mismatches.bash pm/scripts/validate.sh BACKLOG.md(current main validator) → unchanged token set.🤖 Generated with Claude Code