This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
make process.extract accept {dict, list}-like choices - #69
Merged
Conversation
Previously, process.extract expected lists or dictionaries, and tested
this with isinstance() calls. In keeping with the spirit of Python (duck
typing and all that), this change enables one to use extract() on any
dict-like object for dict-like results, or any list-like object for
list-like results.
So now we can (and, indeed, I've added tests for these uses) call
extract() on things like:
- a generator of strings ("any iterable")
- a UserDict
- custom user-made classes that "look like" dicts
(or, really, anything with a .items() method that behaves like a dict)
- plain old lists and dicts
The behavior is exactly the same for previous use cases of
lists-and-dicts.
This change goes along nicely with PR seatgeek#68, since those docs suggest
dict-like behavior is valid, and this change makes that true.
Member
|
@acslater00 how does this look? |
Contributor
|
@acslater00 bump |
acslater00
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2015
make process.extract accept {dict, list}-like choices
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, process.extract expected lists or dictionaries, and tested
this with isinstance() calls. In keeping with the spirit of Python (duck
typing and all that), this change enables one to use extract() on any
dict-like object for dict-like results, or any list-like object for
list-like results.
So now we can (and, indeed, I've added tests for these uses) call
extract() on things like:
(or, really, anything with a .items() method that
behaves like a dict)
The behavior is exactly the same for previous use cases of
lists-and-dicts.
This change goes along nicely with PR #68, since those docs suggest
dict-like behavior is valid, and this change makes that true.