Represent line-coverage data in objects

[staabm]

analog #1105 but for regular line coverage data

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 82.60870% with 60 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.83%. Comparing base (37047b5) to head (1319902).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/Node/File.php	66.88%	50 Missing ⚠️
src/Report/Html/Renderer/Dashboard.php	92.30%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/Node/AbstractNode.php	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/Data/ProcessedTraitType.php	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/Report/Clover.php	94.11%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/Report/Crap4j.php	90.90%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/Report/OpenClover.php	94.44%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/Report/Xml/Facade.php	95.65%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #1109   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     88.82%   88.83%           
- Complexity     1391     1396    +5     
=========================================
  Files            98      102    +4     
  Lines          4655     4658    +3     
=========================================
+ Hits           4135     4138    +3     
  Misses          520      520           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[staabm]

very interessting.. this PR does not yet yield a measurable performance improvement in the cases I tested. neither perf nor memory wise.

still its a improvement regarding maintainability and readability.

[sebastianbergmann]

Why is this still a draft? Thanks.

[staabm]

because it did not yield the expected perf results. if you are fine with the change we can still go ahead