New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rule-update should disable Suricata rules if running Snort #639

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this Issue Mar 24, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@GoogleCodeExporter

GoogleCodeExporter commented Mar 24, 2015

PulledPork should disable SURICATA rules if running Snort

Original issue reported on code.google.com by doug.bu...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2014 at 10:17

@GoogleCodeExporter

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@GoogleCodeExporter

GoogleCodeExporter Mar 24, 2015

[deleted comment]

GoogleCodeExporter commented Mar 24, 2015

[deleted comment]
@GoogleCodeExporter

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@GoogleCodeExporter

GoogleCodeExporter Mar 24, 2015

Original comment by doug.bu...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2014 at 10:25

  • Changed title: rule-update should disable Suricata rules if running Snort
  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

GoogleCodeExporter commented Mar 24, 2015

Original comment by doug.bu...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2014 at 10:25

  • Changed title: rule-update should disable Suricata rules if running Snort
  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****
@GoogleCodeExporter

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@GoogleCodeExporter

GoogleCodeExporter Mar 24, 2015

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/security-onion/XvLfSZQKokQ/discussion

Original comment by doug.bu...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2014 at 10:25

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

GoogleCodeExporter commented Mar 24, 2015

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/security-onion/XvLfSZQKokQ/discussion

Original comment by doug.bu...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2014 at 10:25

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****
@GoogleCodeExporter

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@GoogleCodeExporter

GoogleCodeExporter Mar 24, 2015

Submitted for testing:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/security-onion-testing/ktq4jQo_oLw/discussion

Original comment by doug.bu...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2014 at 10:35

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

GoogleCodeExporter commented Mar 24, 2015

Submitted for testing:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/security-onion-testing/ktq4jQo_oLw/discussion

Original comment by doug.bu...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2014 at 10:35

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****
@GoogleCodeExporter

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@GoogleCodeExporter

GoogleCodeExporter Mar 24, 2015

Published:
http://blog.securityonion.net/2014/12/new-version-of-securityonion-rule.html

Original comment by doug.bu...@gmail.com on 8 Dec 2014 at 2:00

  • Changed state: Verified
  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

GoogleCodeExporter commented Mar 24, 2015

Published:
http://blog.securityonion.net/2014/12/new-version-of-securityonion-rule.html

Original comment by doug.bu...@gmail.com on 8 Dec 2014 at 2:00

  • Changed state: Verified
  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment