Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a script or function to re-index existing data while switching/updating to a new model #1983

Closed
tacohiddink opened this issue Jun 14, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
autoclosed Closed by the bot. We still want this, but it didn't quite make the latest prioritization round

Comments

@tacohiddink
Copy link

When switching to a different t2v-transformers model, do I have to re-index the current data that is already in Weaviate? Or does weaviate replace the vectors automatically? I am wondering what happens or what to do with existing data (that probably has vectors based on the old model)

I would consider it a valid use-case as models get better over time and one would probably switch to a newer model then. Probably need to re-index the whole db from scratch then.

Can a command be created to facilitate such a usse-case?

@zoltan-fedor
Copy link

I was thinking about the same.

I could imagine a similar process as to what you have when you do key rotation in a key-based authentication.

Basically having two embeddings, where the second one is the one currently built and once the build is complete, then you switch from the first to the second one.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 20, 2022

Thank you for your contribution to Weaviate. This issue has not received any activity in a while and has therefore been marked as stale. Stale issues will eventually be autoclosed. This does not mean that we are ruling out to work on this issue, but it most likely has not been prioritized high enough in the last months.
If you believe that this issue should remain open, please leave a short reply. This lets us know that the issue is not abandoned and acts as a reminder for our team to consider prioritizing this again.
Please also consider if you can make a contribution to help with the solution of this issue. If you are willing to contribute, but don't know where to start, please leave a quick message and we'll try to help you.
Thank you, The Weaviate Team

@stale stale bot added the autoclosed Closed by the bot. We still want this, but it didn't quite make the latest prioritization round label Sep 20, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Sep 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autoclosed Closed by the bot. We still want this, but it didn't quite make the latest prioritization round
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants