[FIX] parsing containers of enums not working

[eseiler]

In #1196, we forgot to allow for, e.g. std::vector<foo::bar>, where foo::bar is an enum.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2381 (944ed2b) into master (a1d5d4d) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2381   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.21%   98.21%           
=======================================
  Files         265      265           
  Lines       10806    10820   +14     
=======================================
+ Hits        10613    10627   +14     
  Misses        193      193           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ude/seqan3/argument_parser/detail/format_parse.hpp	96.80% <100.00%> (ø)
include/seqan3/alphabet/alphabet_base.hpp	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
include/seqan3/alphabet/adaptation/char.hpp	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
include/seqan3/alphabet/adaptation/uint.hpp	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
include/seqan3/alphabet/aminoacid/aa10li.hpp	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...clude/seqan3/alphabet/aminoacid/aminoacid_base.hpp	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...n3/search/dream_index/interleaved_bloom_filter.hpp	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a1d5d4d...944ed2b. Read the comment docs.

[Irallia]

Thank you, for the fast help!
LGFM :)

[marehr]

Looks good, but can we generalise it ?

[marehr]

Suggested change

	requires input_stream_over<std::istringstream, typename container_option_t::value_type> ||
	named_enumeration<typename container_option_t::value_type>
	requires requires (std::ranges::value_type<container_option_t> & container_value, std::string const & in)
	{
	{ parse_option_value(container_value, in) } -> std::same_as<option_parse_result>;
	}

wouldn't that be more general? If it is a container, try to defer to its value_type (that's exactly what the function does). The only problem would be container that have themselves as value_type xD

Since we also have overloads for bool and other things, I guess std::vector<bool> does not work right now?

[eseiler]

Very good catch, std::vector<bool> did not work. The concept was hard to write... tldr: you need an instance of the class if you want to test member functions, but the compiler does not necessarily tell you :)

I opted to use container_option_t::value_type instead of the ranges thing:

1. Doesn't seem to be currently included (less includes :) )
2. It currently requires sequence_container, which requires value_type to be defined

If this is good, you can squash

[marehr]

Very nice!