Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(optimistic-locking): fix missing manual #11850

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 21, 2020

Conversation

@papb
Copy link
Member

papb commented Jan 20, 2020

The manual on optimistic locking was missing from the left menu because apparently ESDoc only renders those for manuals with a single # at the top level

@codecov

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #11850 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #11850   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.26%   96.26%           
=======================================
  Files          94       94           
  Lines        9191     9191           
=======================================
  Hits         8848     8848           
  Misses        343      343

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 365d7c3...b785f87. Read the comment docs.

@sushantdhiman sushantdhiman merged commit e1fef55 into master Jan 21, 2020
4 checks passed
4 checks passed
codecov/patch Coverage not affected when comparing 365d7c3...b785f87
Details
codecov/project 96.26% remains the same compared to 365d7c3
Details
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
@sushantdhiman sushantdhiman deleted the fix-optimistic-locking-manual branch Jan 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.