Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(optimistic-locking): fix missing manual #11850

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2020

Conversation

papb
Copy link
Member

@papb papb commented Jan 20, 2020

The manual on optimistic locking was missing from the left menu because apparently ESDoc only renders those for manuals with a single # at the top level

@papb papb added status: awaiting maintainer type: docs For issues and PRs. Things related to documentation, such as changes in the manuals / API reference. labels Jan 20, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #11850 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #11850   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.26%   96.26%           
=======================================
  Files          94       94           
  Lines        9191     9191           
=======================================
  Hits         8848     8848           
  Misses        343      343

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 365d7c3...b785f87. Read the comment docs.

@sushantdhiman sushantdhiman merged commit e1fef55 into master Jan 21, 2020
@sushantdhiman sushantdhiman deleted the fix-optimistic-locking-manual branch January 21, 2020 06:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: docs For issues and PRs. Things related to documentation, such as changes in the manuals / API reference.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants